In the 5th part of our “Does It Matter?” series, we took a deep dive into NFL statistics to unearth the factors that contribute to a wide receiver’s success. We’re thrilled to share that our number crunching has not only confirmed the significance of weight but also pinpointed two weight ranges to aide in the evaluation of players.
*Does your high school need mini helmets to boost booster sales or as gifts for senior night? In just two weeks, we generated over $1,000 in sales for the two local high schools displayed below. With vendors now in Texas, Florida, and possibly Colorado, The demand is real, and we can customize your high school’s helmet for any occasion! Contact us today with the button above, and we’ll collaborate with you to create a stunning design for your beloved Alma Mater! Check out all customization options here!
Our journey began by punching in the weight of the top 50 fantasy football wide receivers from 2003 to 2023. To ensure the consistency and reliability of our data, we exclusively utilized NFL draft combine data. We then charted the averages for the top 1, 5, 10, 11-30th, and 31-50th place finishers. That chart can be seen below:
Initial insights from this chart revealed a slight trend: the bulk of higher performers more times than had had a higher weight compared to their lesser performing counterparts. Especially evident in the top 5 and top 10 finishers where they both are at or above the median top 50 finishers for 13/21 (61.9%) of the seasons. Further, the top 5 finishers are at or above the 31-50th place averages finishers 15/21 seasons (71.4%).
However, we wanted to find more clear trends, so we segmented the top 10 finishers’ weights since 2003 by each pound. A comparative analysis with the lower-tier finishers unveiled striking peaks at specific weights, notably 195 and 198 pounds. The top 10 and Bottom 10 charts can be seen below:
Here is all our analytics content! Type in your desired position in the "Position of Topic" to see the key metrics players need for a higher chance of NFL success. Unlock all metrics by signing up with the links provided. For only $0.49/month! 1 week free trial. Cancel anytime.
We wanted to pinpoint an applicable weight range that corresponds with peak performance amongst NFL wide receivers. Therefore, we constructed a differential chart comparing the frequency of weights plus the next 10 pounds. Essentially, the top 10 performers against the bottom 10 performers in 10 pound increments beginning at each labeled weight. This examination brought us to a discovery: an optimal range (204-249lbs) where we observed a significant surge in performance metrics.
We now wanted to verify whether this is a typical WR weight, or a typical top performing WR weight. Therefore, we are going to see at what rate this weight occurs in the bottom 10, then compare it back to the top 10, then fine-tune it to verify whether this is the optimal weight or not.
So here the bottom 10 goes: In the bottom 10 since 2003, there were 210 Wide Receivers. Out of this 210, 93 finished within this weight range, which accounts for 44.3%. This sets the baseline for comparison back to the top 10, which you will see next.
If we find a higher percentage in the top 10, then we found the weight of an average top performing WR, not just an average WR. In the top 10, there once again was 210 athletes. From this 210, 114 measured between 204 and 249lbs. This accounts for 54.3%, and a 10.0% increase from the bottom 10 to the top 10! This may be great, but our work won’t stop there. Next, we will attempt to fine-tune this range to verify this as the top performing weight range, or to find a higher producing one.
As mentioned, we next looked to verify this as the optimal WR weight range, or to find a higher producing one. By fine-tuning our spreadsheet numbers, we were able to beat our initial optimal range by finding a higher producing one. This range occurs in the top 10 16.2% more frequently than in the bottom 10. The range is as follows: 210lbs to 239lbs. This optimal range will be the subject of our study going forward.
In an effort to establish a critical number, we looked to find what weights have not occurred in different leaderboard thresholds since 2003. Here are the minimum weights seen across different leaderboard thresholds since 2003:
From this, 169lbs will be our critical value. This is for our StarPredictor Score (SPS) model, where we will be attempting to predict NFL successes or busts. Essentially, athletes must weigh in at or over 169lbs in order to not be considered a bust. We are hoping to have this model fully functional by the beginning of the 2025 NFL season.
Now we turn our attention towards standard statistical methods, namely linear regression testing. This is to find a correlation between WR weights and fantasy points. The P-value we are hoping for is 0.05 and under, which would indicate strong correlation. Further, when studying world-class athletes, the Rsquared value we are hoping for is a minimum of 1.0%. Here are the weight regression testing numbers:
You can see above that there is a strong correlation between WR weights and fantasy points. Further, the Rsquared value is showcasing that 1.6% of the variances in fantasy points can be explained by weight. These are great findings, and verify the importance of weight when considering Wide Receiver prospects! The regression chart below also shows that as weight increases, fantasy points can be expected to increase as well.
Further, we wanted to compare our data from the most recent decade to two decades ago to reveal time based trends. Those results are seen below:
| 2004-2013 | |||
| Top 10 | 11 through 40 | Bottom 10 | |
| All count | 100 | 300 | 100 |
| Between 210 and 239lbs | 50 | 100 | 31 |
| % (hard zone/all) | 50.0% | 33.3% | 31.0% |
| 2014-2023 | |||
| Top 10 | 11 through 40 | Bottom 10 | |
| All count | 100 | 300 | 100 |
| Between 210 and 239lbs | 47 | 106 | 30 |
| % (hard zone/all) | 47.0% | 35.3% | 30.0% |
From this chart, there are no real trends to be seen. The top 10 to bottom 10 percentage increase remains relatively the same (19.0% and 17.0%, respectively).
Our analysis didn’t stop at historical data. We’ve applied our findings to the most recent rookies. We’ve identified three standout prospects within the “hard range” and eight promising talents within the “soft range.” We broke it down into each range below:
Our analysis has shown how the 210-239lbs weight range influences the success trajectory of NFL receivers. More than just a number, weight emerges as another tool in fantasy football enthusiasts’ evaluation tool-belt for wide receivers.
Our series has always sought to push the boundaries of sports analytics, and this latest installment reaffirms our commitment to uncovering the hidden dynamics that define the game. Every Saturday We will dive deep into the most intriguing questions, bust myths, and settle debates with thorough analysis similar to this. We thrive on curiosity and welcome your input — so please, leave comments or reach out to us with topics you’re eager to see dissected next. All of our research can be found on our Analytics Page. Up next on our agenda for Part 7 of “Does It Matter?” is an examination of Wide Receiver Hand: Does that impact performance? If so, what’s the ideal Hand Size for a WR? Mark your calendars; every Saturday we shed light on the topics that matter to you. All it takes is a short question and we will go to work for you!
Here is all our analytics content! Type in your desired position in the "Position of Topic" to see the key metrics players need for a higher chance of NFL success. Unlock all metrics by signing up with the links provided. For only $0.49/month! 1 week free trial. Cancel anytime.
Support these analytics and unlock our Ultimate Athlete Blueprints, where all of our research comes together in one table for all positions. 7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
BrainyBallers Buy-Hold-Sell Chart (All Players)
Profit on BrainyBallers’ content if it turns out to be incorrect!
For part 30 of our “Does It Matter?” series, we looked into the question of whether a defensive back’s height can be
If it feels like the TE position has been rough this year don’t feel bad. It has been. Today we are taking
For the 28th installment of our “Does It Matter?” series, we set out to determine whether a Running Back’s draft capital can
