Jermaine Burton
Image By Gary Cosby Jr. USA TODAY Sports
Jermaine Burton
Image By Gary Cosby Jr. USA TODAY Sports

NFL Wide Receivers: Do Vertical Jumps Matter? A Comprehensive Analysis

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit

For part 16 of our “Does It Matter?” series, we looked into vertical jumps and whether they can help predict NFL Wide Receiver success. After number crunching, we discovered an optimal range which we compared to the 2024 rookie WR class. Here’s a detailed breakdown of our research.

Methodology

To ensure consistency, we focused exclusively on NFL Draft Combine numbers. Further, we looked only at the top 50 fantasy football finishers since 2003. Our database relied specifically on PPR (Points Per Reception) fantasy scores. Throughout this study, you will hear the “Bottom 10” which is defined as fantasy football finishers 41-50th place every year.

Averages Performances Chart

To attempt to visually identify any obvious trends, we created an averages chart which divides the top 50 finishers since 2003 into four groups. The four groups are as follows:

  • Top 5 finishers
  • Top 10 finishers
  • 11th-30th place finishers
  • 31st-50th place finishers

From this chart, it was difficult to identify any trends. The top 10 finishers (orange line) finished at or above the 31st-50th place finishers (light blue line) just above half of the seasons (12/21 times). The chart can be seen here:

Average Fantasy football WR Results By Vertical Jumps Since 2003
Average Fantasy football WR Results By Vertical Jumps Since 2003

Segmented WR Vertical Jump Analysis

We then charted the top 10 Wide Receiver finishers from 2003 to 2023, segmenting their vertical jumps into each 0.5-inch increment. We did the same for the bottom 10 finishers to compare back to the top 10 chart. This hopefully would prevail an obvious visual difference between the charts which could lead us to focus on higher vertical jumps (or lower, unexpectedly). It does appear from these that the top 10 chart has more high vertical jumps than the bottom 10.

Top 10 NFL Wide Receiver Vertical Jump Finishes Since 2003
Top 10 NFL Wide Receiver Vertical Jump Finishes Since 2003
Bottom 10 NFL Wide Receiver Vertical Jump Finishes Since 2003
Bottom 10 NFL Wide Receiver Vertical Jump Finishes Since 2003

Differences Chart Findings

As is the basis of all of our studies, we now turn our attention to identify a vertical jump threshold that is related with higher performances using our differences chart. This chart compared each vertical jump measurement plus the next 2 inches, subtracting the bottom 10 results from the top 10. The chart’s desired outcome is a negative number for unique differences (Orange) and a positive number for non-unique differences (Blue). This would indicate the desired consistent top level performances we are hoping for. The findings from this chart were that a vertical jump of 37 inches appeared to be the minimum threshold for top-level WR performance.

Comparison of the Top 10 and Bottom 10 Wide Receivers' Vertical Jump Finishes (Plus the next 2 inches) since 2003
Comparison of the Top 10 and Bottom 10 Wide Receivers’ Vertical Jump Finishes (Plus the next 2 inches) since 2003

Verifying the Optimal WR Range: Bottom 10

To validate our threshold, we compared the vertical jump threshold (37 inches and above) to WRs who finished in the bottom 10 since 2003. Out of 123 WRs, 44 achieved a vertical jump of 37 inches or more, accounting for 35.8%. This percentage served as a baseline for our comparison. If more than 35.8% occurs in the top 10, then we found the threshold of an average top performing WR, not just an average WR.

Verifying the Optimal WR Range: Top 10

Among the top 10 WR finishers from 2003-2023, we found that 61 out of 135 finishers had a vertical jump of 37 inches or more, which equals 45.2%. This represented a 9.4% increase over the bottom 10 finishers, suggesting that WRs with higher vertical jumps are more likely to be top performers.

Verifying the Optimal WR Vertical Jump Range: Threshold Adjustment

We recently upgraded our spreadsheet to allow for quick adjustments, and therefore, precise identification and verification of the highest producing vertical jump threshold. By testing various vertical jump ranges, we found that a vertical jump of 38.5 inches and above occurs 15.7% more often in the top 10 than in the bottom 10. Since this is the top producing threshold that we could find, this threshold will be the focus of our study going forward.

Critical Value

Next, we asked a simple question: what vertical jump has never happened at different thresholds since 2003? This was to find a minimum requirement for vertical jumps. Here is a breakdown of the top 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 of the minimum vertical jump measurements that occurred in each of those thresholds.

Top 10 min28.50
Top 20 Min28.50
Top 30 Min27.50
Top 40 Min27.50
Top 50 Min26.00

Since nobody in the top 20 has had a vertical jump under 28.50, We will use this as the critical value that must be met by prospects in our StarPredictor Score (SPS) system.

WR Vertical Jump Regression Testing

Standard statistical methods were then used to see if there is a correlation between vertical jumps and fantasy football production. With a high P-value of 0.772 and a low R-Squared of 0.00012, we observed no significant correlation between vertical jumps alone and fantasy points. A P-value of 0.05 or lower generally indicates a strong correlation. The R-Squared shown here means that only 0.012% of the variation in fantasy production can be explained by changes in vertical jump performance. Further, 99.988% of the variance can be attributed to other factors. Generally speaking, when studying world class athletes, we are hoping for a R-Squared value of 1.0% at a minimum. For reference to data which prevailed correlation, part 13 of our “Does It Matter?” series found that BMI predicts 1.4% of the changes in WR fantasy points.

WR Vertical Jumps To Fantasy Points Linear Regression
WR Vertical Jumps To Fantasy Points Linear Regression

Decadal Differences

Despite no regression testing support, we wanted to compare our optimal threshold across the last two decades for the believers in this metric. That breakdown can be seen below, where the most recent decade showed a 6.7% decline in the frequency of our vertical jump threshold in the top 10 when comparing the bottom 10 to the top 10 across both decades.

2004-2013
Top 1011 through 40Bottom 10
All count5520351
At and above 38.517526
% (hard zone/all)30.9%25.6%11.8%
2014-2023
Top 1011 through 40Bottom 10
All count7221466
At and above 38.5224412
% (hard zone/all)30.6%20.6%18.2%

2024 Rookie WR Class

We looked into the current rookie WR class, assessing how they fit into the identified vertical jump threshold. Those findings can be seen below, with no WR’s falling under the critical value.

Rookies Above 38.5:
  • Jermaine Burton
  • Brian Thomas Jr.
  • Ryan Flournoy
  • Anthony Gould
  • Bub Means
  • Adonai Mitchell
  • Devontez Walker
  • Jalen Coker
  • Malik Washington
  • Troy Franklin
  • Rome Odunze
  • Xavier Legette
  • Xavier Worthy
  • Ricky Pearsall

Rookies below 28.5 (Critical Value):
  • N/A

No Vertical Jump Measured:
  • Malachi Corley
  • Marvin Harrison Jr.
  • Malik Nabers
  • Tayvion Robinson
  • Ainias Smith
  • Xavier Weaver
  • Jordan Whittington
  • Roman Wilson

Conclusion

While vertical jumps alone are not definitive predictors, the 38.5 and above increased frequency in top-tier fantasy performances is undeniable. Although, standard statistical methods show no significant correlation between vertical jumps and fantasy football production. We cannot wait to see what happens when we begin using multiple regression to test vertical jumps alongside other metrics to find definitive correlation using standard methods.

More Data Next Week!

Our series has always sought to push the boundaries of sports analytics. This latest installment reaffirms our commitment to uncovering the hidden dynamics that define the game. Every Saturday, we’ll dive into intriguing questions, bust myths, and settle debates with thorough analysis. We welcome your input. Therefore, please leave comments or reach out with topics you’re eager to see dissected. All of our research can be found on our Analytics Page. Up next on our agenda for Part 17 of “Does It Matter?” is an examination of WR Broad Jumps: Do they matter? If so, what’s the Broad Jump threshold necessary for success? Mark your calendars; every Saturday we shed light on the topics that matter to you. All it takes is a quick question being asked and we will go to work for you!

Stats To Use For Scouting Potential League Winners

Everybody Knows Stats Are Cool. But Which Stats Are The Coolest and Mean The Most? Additionally, what are the target benchmarks athletes should aim to achieve in each statistic? That's what this chart answers. Type in your desired position in the "Position" field to see the key metrics players need for a higher chance of NFL success. Then, filter the success boost or Pearson value from highest to lowest to see which stats mean the most. Pearson values of 0.1 and higher OR -0.1 or lower indicates correlation. Unlock all metrics by signing up with the links provided. For only $0.49/month!

Support these analytics and unlock our Ultimate Athlete Blueprints, where all of our research comes together in one table for all positions. 7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Analytics Membership

BrainyBallers Buy-Hold-Sell Chart (All Players)

Make Money on BrainyBallers’ (Or anyone’s) content if it turns out to be incorrect!

Jermaine Burton Stats

More to explorer