Ladd McCionkey
Photo by Tony Walsh
Ladd McCionkey
Photo by Tony Walsh

NFL Wide Receivers: Does Arm Length Matter? A Comprehensive Analysis

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit

In the latest installment of our “Does It Matter?” series, we continued our number crunching addiction to find the impacts of arm length on an NFL wide receivers performance. Traditionally, metrics such as height, weight, and speed have been the primary focus when evaluating the potential of wide receivers. Through our research and number crunching, we’ve uncovered interesting findings that could change how we evaluate wide receiver prospects. In this article we reveal the arm length threshold that signifies a higher performance level. Further, we found ten rookie WRs you might want to rethink due to their measurements.

The Basis of Our Research

Our research began with a simple question: Does arm length influence the performance of NFL Wide Receivers? To answer this, we collected the top 50 fantasy football finishers since 2003. We only relied on NFL Draft Combine measurements for a consistent data set.

We analyzed the data to identify trends across different performance brackets: the top 1, 5, 10, and 11-50th place finishers. From this, a promising pattern emerged: in 17 out of 21 seasons, the average arm length of the top 5 wide receivers was equal to or greater than that of wide receivers ranked 31st to 50th. This is 80.9%, suggesting that superior performers might indeed possess longer arms.

Average Fantasy football WR Results By Arm Lengths Since 2003
Average Fantasy football WR Results By Arm Lengths Since 2003

Deep Dive Into the Data

Our number crunching didn’t stop there. We plotted the arm lengths of the top 10 and bottom 10 finishers in 1/8″ increments and compared both. This comparison revealed significant performance jumps at 34″, 32.625″, and 31″ inches. This led us to believe 31 inches was a possible minimum arm length for peak performance.

Top 10 NFL Wide Receiver Arm Length Finishes Since 2003
Top 10 Fantasy Football Wide Receivers By Arm Length Since 2003
Bottom 10 Fantasy Football Wide Receivers By Arm Length Since 2003

Although, we sought to pinpoint an arm length range where the most remarkable performance boosts occurred. This led to the creation of our differences chart. This compares each arm length and the next 1 inch by subtracting the results of the bottom 10 from the top 10.

From this chart, we see a clear increase in more top 10 finishes than bottom 10 finishes beginning at 30.625″ (blue). The chart’s desired outcome is a negative number for unique differences and a positive number for non-unique differences. This increase continues throughout the remainder of the chart besides two small blips at 34.625″ and 34.75″. Further, we see a negative unique number at 30.625″ and extending throughout the remainder of the chart besides two small blips between 33.875″ and 34″ (green). This positive non unique difference coupled with a negative unique differences from the top 10 to the bottom 10 shows players who more consistently performed at a high level. Essentially, if they showed up in the top 10 once, they were more than likely to do it again. This set 30.625″ and above as the threshold, since that is when the inverted positive and negative values begins.

The WR Threshold Further Unveiled

To further test this threshold, we compared the arm lengths of the top 10 NFL Wide Receivers to the arm lengths of receivers who ranked in the bottom 10 during the same period. Out of 146 receivers evaluated in the bottom 10, 115 had an arm length exceeding this threshold, representing 78.8%. This percentage served as a baseline to examine whether found the average NFL WR arm length, or if we found the average high performing NFL WR arm length. The findings were quite revealing. Among the receivers who finished in the top 10 from 2003 to 2023, 157 out of 172 exceeded the arm length threshold, which corresponds to 91.3%. This indicates a 12.5% increase in the prevalence of longer arm lengths among the top performers compared to those in the bottom 10!

Decadal Differences In WR Arm Lengths

Delving deeper, we wanted to compare decades to see if there are any recent trends supporting or nullifying this arm length threshold. Those results are seen below:

2004 to 2013:

Top 10: 92.1%, 11-40th: 81.5%, Bottom 10: 81.0%

2014 to 2023:

Top 10: 94.2%, 11-40th: 86.5%, Bottom 10: 76.5%

There’s a noticeable increase in the percentage of players in the top 10 and 11-40th place with arm lengths above the threshold, only further supporting the threshold’s importance.

Rookie Wide Receivers to Watch (and Possibly Avoid)

In light of our findings, we wanted to look at the incoming class of rookie wide receivers. Ten players fell short of the 30.625″ threshold. While this doesn’t mean they are disqualified from NFL success obviously, history suggests a steeper hill to climb to achieve top-tier performance for these following names:

  • Ladd McConkey (30.25”)
  • Roman Wilson (30.375”)
  • Malik Washington (30.375”)
  • Anthony Gould (29.625”)
  • Isaiah Williams (30.125”)
  • Jacob Cowing (29.25”)
  • Ainias Smith (29”)
  • Luke McCaffrey (30.125”)
  • Tahj Washington (29.125”)
  • Jordan Whittington (30.375”)

Conclusion

As seen in our recent studies, the ideal height for a wide receiver is 6’2.5” to 6’3”. Data indicated a 6.4% increase in representation among the top 10 WRs compared to those outside this top tier. Similarly, the weight range of 220-240 pounds was found. With the top 10 WRs having a 10.9% higher representation in this category over those ranking from 11th to 50th since 2003. And now we know the preferred arm length is above 30.625″, as seen by a 12.5% rate increase of this length appearing in the top 10. Arm length, as shown by the data, can be used as a talent evaluation tool when assessing NFL Wide Receivers.

More Data Next Week!

Our series has always sought to push the boundaries of sports analytics, and this latest installment reaffirms our commitment to uncovering the hidden dynamics that define the game. Every Saturday We will dive deep into the most intriguing questions, bust myths, and settle debates with thorough analysis similar to this. We thrive on curiosity and welcome your input — so please, leave comments or reach out to us with topics you’re eager to see dissected next. All of our research can be found on our Analytics Page. Up next on our agenda for Part 6 of “Does It Matter?” is an examination of Wide Receiver Arm Sizes: Does that impact performance? If so, what’s the ideal Arm Size for a WR? Mark your calendars; every Saturday we shed light on the topics that matter to you. All it takes is a short question and we will go to work for you!

Stats To Use For Scouting Potential League Winners

Everybody Knows Stats Are Cool. But Which Stats Are The Coolest and Mean The Most? Additionally, what are the target benchmarks athletes should aim to achieve in each statistic? That's what this chart answers. Type in your desired position in the "Position" field to see the key metrics players need for a higher chance of NFL success. Then, filter the success boost or Pearson value from highest to lowest to see which stats mean the most. Pearson values of 0.1 and higher OR -0.1 or lower indicates correlation. Unlock all metrics by signing up with the links provided. For only $0.49/month!

Support these analytics and unlock our Ultimate Athlete Blueprints, where all of our research comes together in one table for all positions. 7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Analytics Membership

BrainyBallers Buy-Hold-Sell Chart (All Players)

Profit on BrainyBallers’ content if it turns out to be incorrect!

Ladd McConkey Stats

More to explorer