Image By Joshua Gunter, cleveland.com
Image By Joshua Gunter, cleveland.com

Tight Ends: Can Athleticism Scores Help Predict NFL Success?

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit

For our 95-part “Does It Matter?” series we looked to solve another fantasy football question: does a Tight End’s raw athleticism translate to elite NFL production? By leveraging PlayerProfiler’s Athleticism Score, we crunched nearly two decades of data to determine if this metric is a reliable predictor of future success or simply noise. Here are all of our findings.

Methodology

To ensure our data was statistically significant without being skewed by outliers, we analyzed the top 50 PPR fantasy finishers at the position since 2003. All Athleticism scores were sourced from PlayerProfiler.com.

Why the top 50? We chose this range to establish a “happy medium.” If we included every rostered player, this would introduce too much “noise” from the athletes who were never expected to produce – resulting in skewed data. Conversely, we needed a large enough sample to contrast the best to the worst. By comparing the Top 10 finishers against the “Bottom 10” (those finishing 41st–50th), we created a clear comparison through which we can come to a conclusion on whether Athleticism score actually matters.

Our analysis began with an averages chart segmented into four tiers: top 5, top 10, 11th–30th, and 31st–50th place finishers since 2009. The trend from this was undeniable: as Athleticism Scores rose, so did fantasy production. Specifically, in 16 of the last 17 seasons (94.1%), the top five fantasy finishers possessed higher Athleticism scores than those in the 31st–50th range.

Average Fantasy football TE Results By Their Athleticism Scores Since 2009
Average Fantasy football TE Results By Their Athleticism Scores Since 2009

Segmented Top & Bottom 10 TE Finishers Since 2005

Next, we charted every top 10 finisher since 2005 into 1.0 Athleticism Score buckets. From comparing the weight and distribution of both these charts, it further proved that elite fantasy production is rarely achieved by subpar athletes. You can tell this by comparing the weight and distribution of both of these charts, where you will see the top 10 comes first:

Top 10 NFL Athleticism Scores 2005
Top 10 NFL Athleticism Scores 2005
Bottom 10 NFL Athleticism Scores 2005
Bottom 10 NFL Athleticism Scores 2005

TE Athleticism Score Differences Chart Analysis

Beyond general trends, we wanted to find an applicable threshold that historically signals top-level consistency. Our goal was to filter out the “one-hit wonders” and unique outliers to identify a range that consistently houses the league’s top performers. To do this, we created a Differences Chart. This compared each Athleticism Score (plus a rolling window of the next 3.0 points) and subtracted the Bottom 10 results from the Top 10 results within that specific window. The chart’s desired outcome is a negative number for unique differences (Orange) and a positive number for non-unique differences (Blue). This revealed that scores of 111 and above could serve as the optimal range to top-tier performance which significantly separates the elite producers from the rest of the pack.

Comparison of the Top 10 and Bottom 10 TE Athleticism Scores Plus the next 3.0 since 2005
Comparison of the Top 10 and Bottom 10 TE Athleticism Scores Plus the next 3.0 since 2005

Verifying The TE Optimal Range

After identifying the initial 111-point floor, we performed “range adjustments” within our dataset to pinpoint the absolute highest producing optimal range. Through iterative testing of various scores near our initial finding, a specific optimal range emerged. We found that an Athleticism Score of 113 and above is the optimal range. This range produces a 28.0% higher Top 10 appearance rate than the Bottom 10. For fantasy managers, this is the number that you should look for in athletes and will also be included in our Ultimate Athlete Blueprints which offers an easy-to-read table housing all of our researched metrics combined in one place for you to view as seen here:

Star-Predictor Score (SPS) Predictive Model

Due to these findings, Athleticism Scores could play a factor in our Star-Predictor Score (SPS) model. The Star-Predictor Score (SPS) is a scouting tool designed to maximize investment potential and reduce risks when drafting rookies in Fantasy Football. It is proven to have a higher accuracy than draft capital alone to predict fantasy football success. The SPS includes 13 to 17 metrics, with the exact number varying by the player’s position. All these metrics are pre-NFL – some of which are proprietary to BrainyBallers – providing a complete analysis of a player’s analytical profile. The SPS gained widespread notoriety for its high accuracy, having made it on Barstool and The Pat McAfee Show. The SPS can be found here, and future projected SPS grades can be unlocked here.

Build a Dynasty Juggernaut

Don’t just draft for this year. Gain the knowledge needed to position yourself to secure your future with SPS rookie data.

  • Projections Are Live Now: Get Exclusive Access to Projections (plus Official Grades when finalized) for the Next 2 Rookie Classes Before the World Sees Them
  • Identify Multi-Year Stars Before the Hype
  • Avoid “Consensus” Busts in Your Rookie Drafts
Unlock Rookie Intel Now Gain the unfair advantage starting now!

Pearson Correlation Coefficient

To ensure these findings weren’t just anecdotal, we applied standard statistical analysis to the data. Our research yielded a Pearson Value of 0.246.

A Pearson value of 0.246 confirms a strong correlation between Athleticism Scores and future fantasy production. We are hoping for a minimum of 0.1, or an inverse correlation maximum of -0.1 when studying world-class athletes as we are. For reference to something that everyone acknowledges matters in prospect scouting, and to show the accompanying Pearson value, QB draft capital prevailed a -0.219 Pearson value.

Conclusion

When you are deciding between two players in a draft or evaluating a specific prospect, the Athleticism Score could serve as your tiebreaker. By targeting players who fall within the 113+ range, you are aligning your roster with the historical profile of a Top 10 finisher. In the search for the next elite Tight End, the data confirms that athleticism isn’t just noise and it does in fact matter.

More Data Next Week!

Our series has always sought to push the boundaries of sports analytics. This latest installment reaffirms our commitment to uncovering the hidden dynamics that define the game. Every Saturday, we’ll dive into intriguing questions, bust myths, and settle debates with thorough analysis. We welcome your input. Therefore, please leave comments or reach out with topics you’re eager to see dissected. All of our research can be found on our Analytics Page. Up next on our agenda for Part 96 of “Does It Matter?” is an examination of Tight End Top 1st Downs Season: Do They Matter? If so, what’s the Top 1st Downs Season threshold necessary for NFL success? Mark your calendars; every Saturday we shed light on the topics that matter to you. All it takes is a quick question being asked and we will go to work for you!

PremiumBB

BrainyBallers Buy-Hold-Sell Chart (All Players)

Join Our Promos To Get Your Products 100% Refunded!

Jaxson Dart Stats

More to explore